Re: To John
- From: MiNe 109 <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:26:38 -0600
In article <27mdnVeqGv3d3M3anZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"MiNe 109" <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:smcelroy2-2064BC.10305930112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article
<jennconductsREMOVETHIS-DBB0AA.07474430112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
om>,
Jenn <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<smcelroy2-4EEFB3.09425730112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
MiNe 109 <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
That's an odd admission. Why does Sun Tzu have any
opinion of John?
Arny recently admitted on another newsgroup that he has
"targets".
I believe it. He's been attacking me for years. The first
I remember was a topic on which he and I actually agreed!
Go figure.
Stephen, its been long known that you don't know yourself well enough to
know whether you agree with something or not.
You're right, except for it being true or known. You'd have to take my
statements at face value. In this case, my view that you seemingly
disputed, taken at face value, was in agreement with your view taken at
face value.
Stephen
.
- References:
- Re: To John
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: To John
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: To John
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: To John
- From: MiNe 109
- Re: To John
- From: Jenn
- Re: To John
- From: MiNe 109
- Re: To John
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: To John
- Prev by Date: Re: Could I have paid JGH to say it better?
- Next by Date: Re: To John
- Previous by thread: Re: To John
- Next by thread: Re: To John
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|