Re: To John
- From: MiNe 109 <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:42:57 -0600
In article <OLydnXCUmYxjms3anZ2dnUVZ_v-hnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"John Atkinson" <Stereophile_Editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message
news:5c1d0c40-53cb-412f-be10-42ffcef554ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 29, 10:24 pm, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVET...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-879B80.17501418092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
rodigy.com
Excellent "As We See It" in the new issue, John.
Now posted at
http://www.stereophile.com/asweseeit/1107awsi/
No. Jenn's September 18 posting was referring to my essay
in
the October issue of Stereophile:
http://www.stereophile.com/asweseeit/1007awsi/
Looks like Stereophile is now trying to commit commercial
suicide by railing against solipsism. ;-)
If you say so, Mr. Krueger.
I don't know if some version of this is in "The Art of War" or not, but here
goes:
When one takes away your opponent's sense of humor, one is very close to
taking away the opponents soul.
I've always wanted nothing but total sucess for you John, but you make it so
hard.
That's an odd admission. Why does Sun Tzu have any opinion of John?
Stephen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To John
- From: Jenn
- Re: To John
- References:
- Re: To John
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: To John
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: To John
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: To John
- Prev by Date: Re: High end directions?
- Next by Date: Re: To John
- Previous by thread: Re: To John
- Next by thread: Re: To John
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|