Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artyguy04@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:52:10 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 16, 2:56 pm, ScottW <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 16, 5:28 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 16, 7:13 am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16 Noi, 03:06, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 16, 12:56 am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16 Noi, 01:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The funniest part to me was the wailing about pollution, when it was
decided by some right here on RAO within the past couple of days that
global warming does not exist. Apparently, pollution only matters when
somebody else does it. These posters are against Kyoto, yet they whine
that China is exempt. Where's the sense in that?
Stop playing stupid
whether one accepts or rejects global warming,
one would be upset that China is exempt.
If one believes in GW, one would be upset that CHina is allowed
to wantonly contribute to the problem.
If one rejects GW, one is upset that China is exempt
from the costly environmental controls other nations have to comply
with.
No, if one is against Kyoto and does not believe GW exists, one would
not use Kyoto or a GW proponent as premises in an argument. That
would be hypocritical.
no, one would have a legitimate complaint.
No, one wouldn't. Why should 2pid care if China does not fall under
Kyoto? Neither does the US.
It doesn't matter though: as it turns out, burning coal is a good
thing!
not about GW, though, but about trade and economies.
Then 2pid should have phrased his argument in those terms, which he
did not. Besides, since the US is not a Kyoto signatory, the fact that
China is exempt from Kyoto creates no trade advantage over the US. If
2pid had brought up China's artificial currency valuation as an
economic complaint, that would be something else.
And puhleeze do not try to tell me that 2pid is taking some sort of
big-picture world view. 2pid's 'world view' ends at Orange County. His
'world view' may go as far inland as the Salton Sea.
Lol...I bring up trade, economics, pollution to discuss.
What do you bring up? I meant besides me?
Where did I bring you up? I don't see "2pid" mentioned once.
So how do you feel about the 1,000-foot wall and the minefield?
I added: immigration, currency, isolationism, liburral institutions of
higher learning, the liburral socialist school systems, and commented
on your topics.
I'm very sorry that you are too self-centered and too stupid to see
that. Lol!
************************************************************
I'm beginning to wonder if there is anything that certain posters
here
are not afraid of or mad at.
The funniest part to me was the wailing about pollution, when it was
decided by some right here on RAO within the past couple of days that
global warming does not exist. Apparently, pollution only matters
when
somebody else does it. These posters are against Kyoto, yet they
whine
that China is exempt. Where's the sense in that? China exemplifies an
expanding market, which should be positive to these posters. Business
rules! These same people tend to poke fun at the EPA and other
regulatory bodies here. With any luck, certain people in California
will choke on sulfur and coal emissions.
Also funny to me were the arguments by certain posters for
dismantling
the school system. Now, it seems, we have to not only dismantle the
school system, but we must also be very secretive about it.
Since the Chinese are coming to "Liburral institutions of higher
learning", we can anticipate that they'll succumb to the onslaught of
liberal thought just like the conservatives here have. This poster,
in
all his immaculate intelligence, should take heart. These Liburral
thoughts should cause the decay and collapse of China just like they
are right here in the US.
Some people who do not read history and who are not very bright do
not
understand that the "Ponzi Scheme" of allowing immigration to expand
the population is exactly what capitalist societies have done since
capital was invented. In the old days, you merely opened up new
territories and colonies to meet the demand for expanding markets, a
la the Hudson Bay Company. And, just like Athens, Rome, England,
France, Spain, The Netherlands, Portugal and on and on, the US
military leads our foreign policy, which is usually more about money
than what is right. Just like Athens, Rome, England, France, Spain,
The Netherlands, Portugal and on and on.
"Outsourcing" is the secret code word for American business to pay
workers "peanuts". Can you imagine what goods and services would cost
if every job in the US paid a living wage? A slave class is
absolutely
necessary for capitalism to function. We don't call them slaves here,
though. We call them the "working poor". No sense whining about it.
If
Mexicans are willing to voluntarily serve as our new slave class, so
be it. I hope it helps improve their lives.
I think the best solution is to build a great big wall all around all
the borders of the US. Maybe statutorily make it 1,000 feet tall.
Emplace a 30-mile wide minefield behind the wall. Select people can
enter, but only after they take a Loyalty Oath: "Are you, or have you
ever been, a liburral..."
McCarthyism is alive and well on RAO...
LOL!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- References:
- OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: elmir2m@xxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Clyde Slick
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Clyde Slick
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: ScottW
- OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- Prev by Date: Re: Newsworthy
- Next by Date: Re: Founder of The Weather Channel
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|