Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artyguy04@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:06:29 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 16, 12:56 am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16 Noi, 01:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The funniest part to me was the wailing about pollution, when it was
decided by some right here on RAO within the past couple of days that
global warming does not exist. Apparently, pollution only matters when
somebody else does it. These posters are against Kyoto, yet they whine
that China is exempt. Where's the sense in that?
Stop playing stupid
whether one accepts or rejects global warming,
one would be upset that China is exempt.
If one believes in GW, one would be upset that CHina is allowed
to wantonly contribute to the problem.
If one rejects GW, one is upset that China is exempt
from the costly environmental controls other nations have to comply
with.
No, if one is against Kyoto and does not believe GW exists, one would
not use Kyoto or a GW proponent as premises in an argument. That
would be hypocritical.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Clyde Slick
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- References:
- OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: elmir2m@xxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- From: Clyde Slick
- OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- Next by Date: Re: Newsworthy
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Chinese spying #1 threat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
