Re: The New Yorker: The Well-Tempered Web
- From: Jenn <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:14:29 -0700
In article <1193772430.786482.83090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
ScottW <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 29, 8:45 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Interesting thoughts music in the digital age. A thumbs up for the
mention of the San Francisco Symphony/MTT "Keeping Score" project; a
FANTASTIC thing.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/10/22/071022fa_fact_ross?prin...
e=true
Seems to me Atkinson was bitching here about someone posting a
complete
copy of an article.....Considered it a copyright violation.
This doesn't seem like a copyright problem to me, as I posted the link
to their website, thereby giving attribution. At any rate, had I not
done so, someone would have been critical of that. So, whatever.
Anyway..."unregulated openness of the Internet seems to have done it
many favors."
It being classical music.
Giving away recordings inspires interest in performances.
Yes it can. As long as it's the owner's decision, it's a good thing.
Musicians
should not be greedy.
Most are just trying to make ends meet like everyone else.
.
- References:
- The New Yorker: The Well-Tempered Web
- From: Jenn
- Re: The New Yorker: The Well-Tempered Web
- From: ScottW
- The New Yorker: The Well-Tempered Web
- Prev by Date: Re: The New Yorker: The Well-Tempered Web
- Next by Date: Re: and Middiot is jealous..again.
- Previous by thread: Re: The New Yorker: The Well-Tempered Web
- Next by thread: Re: The New Yorker: The Well-Tempered Web
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
