Re: A lot of twaddle about nothing

On Aug 31, 10:47 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 31, 7:01 am, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Bret Ludwig" <bretld...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Low build cost wins-always.

Only if performance is in some relevant sense equal or better.

Insane *and* naive.


For once I am forced to agree.

Usually "the new one" outperforms the old one in some metric while
failing other parameters which may or may not matter. But the build
cost is less. That is the real deciding factor.

Tektronix and HP Agilent abandoned real oscilloscopes because the
digitizing variety were buildable mostly or entirely from comodity
parts, eliminating the electrostatically deflected high bandwidth CRT,
an item requiring skilled and nonfungible labor and hard tooling to
make. The digitizing scope also had other advantages, but it was not
satisfactory to experienced engineers and particularly not service
people. When businesses that traditionally lifted a leg and farted at
"third tier vendors" started buying analog Hameg and Iwatsu scopes
(LeCroy was importing them for awhile!) Tek invented the "digital
phosphor oscilloscope" <sic>. Now the DPO has some advantages over
real scopes and has fixed some of the flaws, but the important thing
is they jacked the price and retained the low build cost.


CD was high production cost for two or three years-as the record
company expected-but the premium price stayed high long after the CD
became cheaper than the old vinyl was to begin with, as they also
expected. They did incredibly well for a decade or so and then the
market took a dump. Now we are supposed to feel sorry for them.
Bullshit.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A lot of twaddle about nothing
    ... real scopes and has fixed some of the flaws, ... is they jacked the price and retained the low build cost. ... company expected-but the premium price stayed high long after the CD ... As for vinyl, does anybody seriously think it is better than CDs? ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Optics makers: STOP Gouging!!!!
    ... >chinese manufacturer but get real its glass and aluminum. ... Some trade low cost for low quality. ... In the case of high dollar price scopes you are paying for labor, ... Yes there are very good $400 to $800 achromat refractors. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Thoughts on why companies cant or wont produce a reasonable priced telescope?
    ... mounts alone that cost 10x that value secondhand isn't exactly helpful. ... Galileo would have given his eye teeth for one of these cheap modern scopes. ... Aldi in particular do sometimes have surprisingly good for the price Bresser spotting scopes in various sizes at remarkably low prices. ... A couple of years back they also had certain Medion PC models at low cost that were sought after by the computer geek fraternity because they would run Apple OSX as a Hackintosh. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Cannot upgrade telescopes
    ... >> selling new scopes so that $50,000 is going into them too. ... >scopes would need a completely different board and electronics. ... >electronic cost of this approach would be lower, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)