Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- From: Jenn <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:11:20 GMT
In article <_CSii.423869$ZA5.222915@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-5DC406.12151004072007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
In article <S%Rii.423840$ZA5.375888@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-F74734.11262404072007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
com
...
In article <ZcRii.258485$Fk2.98520@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-680780.10090404072007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
gy.
com
...
In article <hUPii.52801$s57.11139@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"George M. Middius" <cmndr _ george @ comcast . net> wrote in
message
news:h4in83lgfqbq3j2h58vm82ktglg9air2mj@xxxxxxxxxx
Witlessmongrel snaps at the ghosts of the fleas he already ate.
Hypocrisy? Where? Surely you jest, Scooter. ;-)
If you paid any attention and dropped your Middiot like
predisposition
to
insult and ridicule...you'd realize that's pretty much what I
said.
But you, like many, are here for the dispute, not the
discussion.
Goody. Let's "discuss" your idiocy. Or imbecility, if you
prefer.
Although you are still stuck on the acceptance phase, we
Normals
have
moved on to the causal analysis. The questions we mull are: 1.
Why
does
Scottie deal so badly with his handicap? and 2. How did Scottie
get
Asperger's Syndrome? Recently you disclosed that your mother is
a
pigheaded, diehard, heavy smoker. I admit I haven't researched
links
between smoking during pregnancy and the development of
Asperger's
or
autism. Have you? Is that why you're so furiously in denial?
It's
not
healthy to carry around a huge load of anger and blame. You
should
either confront your mother or seek therapy. It's tough enough
being
mentally handicapped without the added burden of unvented rage.
(This is where you customarily lash out by inventing a bunch of
accusations about me. Let's hope you can break that pattern and
have
a
"discussion", as you just said you want to.)
Let's discuss your rude arrogance and propensity to ridicule
and how it's turned RAO into a flamefest and why you
like it that way.
I called that one!
What inventions. You've admitted guilt to all the above and
claim some "right" to be an ass.
BTW, were your comments to Jenn a few days ago part of a
"discussion"
or
were they an expression of your unvented rage? Just asking.
Are you going to blame me for your feelings about Jenn?
My only problem with Jenn is her lack of self awareness
lol Coming from you...well, never mind.
at times and
the meaning of what she writes.
Yes, it is understood that you, at times, have trouble with
understanding what I write.
Once again...I understand what you type...but you often refuse
to accept that isn't what you meant.
Can you think of specific examples of that?
Yes I can. But I'm not really interested in debating them.
lol I see.
Let's just give it time...I'm sure a fresh example we can
endlessly dissect will come up.
The recent RAHE exchange on
hearing codec artifacts was a good example.
See Scott, the difference between you and me is that when I make a
mistake, I admit it and apologize.
Once isn't even a trend. Meanwhile your (is that better?)
Yes.
tolerance
of the root cause of incivility on this group continues.
Yes, I understand that I can never pay enough attention to George to
satisfy you and Arny. Meanwhile, I was critical of him just this week,
IIRC .
Arny appears to be a non-factor in RAO mostly appearing in cross posts.
He's gone...yet RAO remains a place incapable of hosting thoughtful
audio discussions. Oh well....
Non-addressing of the point noted.
What? That you made one critical comment of George?
I think the fact that you want that flagged as milestone
accomplishment worthy of note says much more than
the one comment.
Who said that I "want that flagged as a milestone"? I simply gave it an
an example. I've been through this already a couple of times. I even
wasted an hour going through Google to pull up examples. I'm not
inclined to do that again. Again: I mostly ignore George. I imagine
that I've read far less than half of what he posts here, and I've
replied to something like 10 of his posts in my time here. If that
doesn't meet with your approval, tough.
So talk some audio
Tried that with 'borg jr...most disappointing.
and ignore the flack.
Sounds like advice I gave you about Arny...
Have you noticed how I replay far less to Arny these days, even when
he's here in "full strength"?
FWIW...sssshhhhieees back in my ignore bin.
I suppose I should do the same with George.
Both are totally useless.
Here's something: Who among us
have gone the route of something like the Squeezebox? How does it sound
compared to CD?
I haven't tried one but since it supports PCM it shouldn't sound
any different than what preamp does to a source. Internet radio
is too compressed for me to invest more than a cable in.
A really critical listening session between, say, a WiFi
laptop/Squeezebox/system, and a CD/system might be interesting. As we
move further away from physical media in music and more and more to
downloads, it would be nice to know what we're headed toward IRT sound.
.
- References:
- Some Earlier Concern About ScottW
- From: JBorg, Jr.
- Re: Some Earlier Concern About ScottW
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Some Earlier Concern About ScottW
- From: ScottW
- Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- From: ScottW
- Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- From: ScottW
- Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- From: Jenn
- Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- From: Jenn
- Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- From: Jenn
- Some Earlier Concern About ScottW
- Prev by Date: Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- Next by Date: Re: Big Problem Topic
- Previous by thread: Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- Next by thread: Re: Scottie rolls over, begs for "discussion"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading