Re: test2
- From: Jenn <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:51:51 -0700
In article <IFffi.444286$7g3.337267@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-6B343C.13295723062007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
In article <9evq73dvieaqlffub089csk466tke7di0q@xxxxxxx>,
Goofball_star_dot_etal <who@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:33:23 -0700, Jenn
<jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <wKcfi.2089$uq2.2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-DB8AA9.10142023062007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
gy.
net
...
test2
Test 3, test 4 test 5.....
I think I pointed out the existence of alt.test to you before.
You might also want to give it a few minutes and see if your post shows
on
google even if you can't see 'em on your SBC server. Failure to see
your
posts
on your ISPs server doesn't mean it didn't get out to rest of the
world.
ScottW
Sigh.... I read groups through a newsreader, not Google. No messages
for this group (from anyone) were showing up this morning in my reader,
but they were showing up in Google. I was tweaking a filter used for
this group, so I needed to see if messages were now showing up in this
group on the reader, even though I knew they were showing up in Google.
It was a group specific thing with my reader, thus alt.test was useless.
Is all of that OK with you?
Try not to filter yourself out in future, Slick.
Try not to make inane comments in the future, Jerk.
Are you claiming the first Test appeared on your reader?
ScottW
Nope.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: test2
- Next by Date: Re: test2
- Previous by thread: Re: test2
- Next by thread: Re: test2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
