Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: MiNe 109 <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:23:47 -0500
In article <mC1Jh.29486$S%2.15835@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"MiNe 109" <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:smcelroy2-78665D.19471211032007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <8P%Ih.29368$S%2.9699@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"MiNe 109" <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:smcelroy2-5797A1.17164411032007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <rW_Ih.17980$g24.5806@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Destroy? I think there is more evidence that Hillary's campaign is
out
to destroy Obama than my little comments warrant.
If you're referring to the madrassa story, that had nothing to do with
Hillary
Are you sure?
Absolutely.
http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Obama_2.htm
I heard Kuhner interviewed on the radio about the Hillary campaign's
denial of involvement. He said their claims to consider suing over
this issue was false...in fact he called them out on the air over it.
He literally dared them to file a lawsuit over it.
He said that they will not sue because in discovery he will be able
to put their investigators who went to Indonesia on the record
under oath. They can't have that...so they won't sue.
The suit would be over the claim that the charge came from Hillary's
campaign. Not worth the trouble.
I haven't heard mention of the Clinton campaign filing suit yet...
have you?
Don't you think they have an obligation to sue if Kuhner and
Insight Magazine lied?
No.
...or is putting it all under the rug in
the best interest of their campaign the right thing to do?
What rug? The story was debunked thoroughly and revealed shoddy
journalistic practices at some of the right-wing organs.
The story was of an investigation conducted by the Clinton campaign.
That story has not been debunked at all.
The total lack of supporting evidence is sufficient.
Stephen
.
- References:
- OT:Threat level raised
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: Harry Lavo
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: MiNe 109
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: MiNe 109
- Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- From: ScottW
- OT:Threat level raised
- Prev by Date: Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- Next by Date: Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- Next by thread: Re: OT:Dems cancel Fox debate (was Threat level raised)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|