Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- From: MINe 109 <smcatut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:11:59 GMT
In article <sL2Og.72475$W01.46694@dukeread08>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"MINe 109" <smcatut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:smcatut-DD18A6.14522713092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1158166002.273435.216920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
ScottW wrote:
How many times have you been given opportunity to outline
a viable alternative? Still you fail. Will once more help?
I already have, toopid. You immediately devolved into a discussion
of
tactics.
Here you go...a new thread just for you to outline your
sure to succeed new strategy for Iraq.
No rewriting history...plot us a new course forward.
One could start by rebuilding their infrastructure we bombed to *** -
like
we
said we were going to in the first place !
You think they haven't been trying?
And stop building American palaces that would put any of Saddam's to
shame.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12319798/
You want a Nairobi style indefensible facility?
BTW...MSNBC isn't a credible source of information. Tabloid
integrity there.
It's an AP story and there's a photo.
They shop stories. Take your pick.
A story from a credible source is incredible if it's on MSNBC?
Stephen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- References:
- OT:Ssssh last try
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- From: MINe 109
- Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- From: ScottW
- OT:Ssssh last try
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Promise?
- Next by Date: Re: OT:WTF is wrong with Nato?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- Next by thread: Re: OT:Ssssh last try
- Index(es):