Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: Sander deWaal <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:58:56 +0200
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
Tube wear is usually grossly overstated; when on for
24/7, a good NOS tube can keep its parameters reasonably
constant for about 10.000 hrs.
Hmm, true confessions? 10 hour tube life?
A real engineer would have known that here in Europe, the use of
commas and periods in numbers are reversed.
Especially for you, I''l restate that number to 10,000 hrs.
--
"Due knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl miss steaks."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: ScottW
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- References:
- tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: ilh . cho
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: Sander deWaal
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: Arny Krueger
- tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- Prev by Date: Re: Kroo vs. Hamm vs. Van Alstine
- Next by Date: Re: RAHE on Vacation
- Previous by thread: Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- Next by thread: Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|