Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:31:29 -0400
"Sander deWaal" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2lftf25t99qqkehrmt248v5m0tdmeqcvst@xxxxxxx
ilh.cho@xxxxxxxxx said:
Tube wear is usually grossly overstated; when on for
24/7, a good NOS tube can keep its parameters reasonably
constant for about 10.000 hrs.
Hmm, true confessions? 10 hour tube life?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: Bret Ludwig
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: Sander deWaal
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- References:
- tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: ilh . cho
- Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- From: Sander deWaal
- tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- Prev by Date: Re: RAHE on Vacation
- Next by Date: Re: Kroo vs. Hamm vs. Van Alstine
- Previous by thread: Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- Next by thread: Re: tube amp -- should it be with tube phono preamp?
- Index(es):
