Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:23:24 -0400
"GregS" <szekeres@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ed4m6c$7k6$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article
<84OdnUJMav32XWjZnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Arny
Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Harry Lavo" <hlavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q5OdneNrp7_iJmjZnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Zr2dnRojP585JWjZnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Harry Lavo" <hlavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:COmdnT22q7zCN2jZnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
my Dad's Newcomb Classic 25 was one...but none that
would be consider truly high fidelity by today's
standards. A Citation II with some judicious cap
upgrades *does* make that grade.
Tweako-freako obsession with so-called cap upgrades
noted.
Well, now I have a glimmering of why your 120 is not
modified, don't I Arny?
Not at all. It isn't modified because its purpose in
life is to be as factory-stock as possible. I'm arready
surrounded with good-sounding amps. If the ST-120 had
audible faults, it would be counter-productive to
eliminate its specialness and make it like all the rest.
I was going to say, did you ABX those good sounding amps??
http://www.pcabx.com/product/amplifiers/index.htm
.
- References:
- Hifi landmarks
- From: soundhaspriority
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: Max
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: soundhaspriority
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: Max
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: Harry Lavo
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: Harry Lavo
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Hifi landmarks
- From: GregS
- Hifi landmarks
- Prev by Date: Re: Hifi landmarks
- Next by Date: Re: Another question for Terrierdork
- Previous by thread: Re: Hifi landmarks
- Next by thread: Re: Hifi landmarks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|