Re: Hifi landmarks

"Harry Lavo" <hlavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q5OdneNrp7_iJmjZnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Zr2dnRojP585JWjZnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Harry Lavo" <hlavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:COmdnT22q7zCN2jZnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx

my Dad's Newcomb Classic 25 was one...but none that
would be consider truly high fidelity by today's
standards. A Citation II with some judicious cap
upgrades *does* make that grade.

Tweako-freako obsession with so-called cap upgrades
noted.

Well, now I have a glimmering of why your 120 is not
modified, don't I Arny?

Not at all. It isn't modified because its purpose in life is to be as
factory-stock as possible. I'm arready surrounded with good-sounding amps.
If the ST-120 had audible faults, it would be counter-productive to
eliminate its specialness and make it like all the rest.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hifi landmarks
    ... upgrades *does* make that grade. ... modified, don't I Arny? ... surrounded with good-sounding amps. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Hifi landmarks
    ... upgrades *does* make that grade. ... modified, don't I Arny? ... I'm arready surrounded with good-sounding amps. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)