Re: OT: UK Times Mistake


"Jenn" <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconducts-B52351.15201211062006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <448c9612$0$30207$b9f67a60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Jenn" <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconducts-FC2677.14361111062006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <4488a322$0$29242$b9f67a60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Jenn" <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconducts-7F0513.07025808062006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <44880838$0$29210$b9f67a60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Jenn" <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconducts-554AE1.22545807062006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <4487b9e7$0$30209$b9f67a60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<NYOB123@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149744700.828106.129630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Gay marriage doesn't demean or cheapen straight mariage, it's
just a
different kind of marriage.

it's a different kind of union.
marriage is between man and woman.
but you are right in that gay unions don't demean marriage.
they are irrelevant.

This is boring, lets talk about polygamy.

Nah, polygomy is all over the Bible...

Let's go in reverse instead: 1967: Relationships between a
black
man
and a white woman isn't a marriage; it's a different kind of
union.

Wrong, its a marriage.
Its between a man and a woman.

Prior to 1967, it WASN'T a marriage in several states.

It wasn't a 'legal' marriage.
At any rate, I am considering the concept of marraige as being much
more
and
beyond a mere legal term.
In terms of legal definiton it could conceivably be between man and
goat,
man and man, man and boy, man and three women, woman and boy, or
between
two
men, three monkeys, four goats, six little girls, and an electric
vibrator.
or whatever strikes one's immediate fancy.

If it's not a legal term, what is it?

an institution

Then it shouldn't be debated in Congress, as Congress makes laws, not
institutions.

True
And it shouldn't be altered by the courts, either.
Absolutely true.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The answer to all the worlds problems.
    ... Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties, ... assist this union which You have ordained; ... The second clearly is a marriage. ... intellectual capability to decide when a rite constitutes a marriage ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: The answer to all the worlds problems.
    ... Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties, ... assist this union which You have ordained; ... The second clearly is a marriage. ... intellectual capability to decide when a rite constitutes a marriage ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: Union of England with Scotland
    ... A unilateral decision to leave the Union is not an option. ... entere into freely with the consent of both parties. ... is the most part of the history of Western marriage. ...
    (rec.heraldry)