Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: "Clyde Slick" <artsackman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 07:21:29 -0400
"Jenn" <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconducts-554AE1.22545807062006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <4487b9e7$0$30209$b9f67a60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<NYOB123@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149744700.828106.129630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gay marriage doesn't demean or cheapen straight mariage, it's just a
different kind of marriage.
it's a different kind of union.
marriage is between man and woman.
but you are right in that gay unions don't demean marriage.
they are irrelevant.
This is boring, lets talk about polygamy.
Nah, polygomy is all over the Bible...
Let's go in reverse instead: 1967: Relationships between a black man
and a white woman isn't a marriage; it's a different kind of union.
Wrong, its a marriage.
Its between a man and a woman.
Back to polygamy now.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: Jenn
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- References:
- OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: Fella
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: NYOB123@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: NYOB123@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: Clyde Slick
- Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- From: Jenn
- OT: UK Times Mistake
- Prev by Date: Re: Autoformers - What's the Deal?
- Next by Date: Re: CD Players vs. Harshness in CD Playing
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- Next by thread: Re: OT: UK Times Mistake
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|