Re: A bit about Robert Morein, RAO's Obsessive Net Terrorist.


paul packer wrote:

soundhaspriority@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I couldn't understand how Robert and others
can believe that Dr. Richard Graham, a London psychiatrist for
adolescent behaviour, family man and mathematics professor, who has
announced that he's too busy to edit his own newsletters and does not
post on usenet, could possibly be me, posting all these messages on RAO
every day. But apparently, Robert and Ludovic Mirabel and Shovels and
Walt and Paul Packer and Steven Sullivan and Powell can all somehow
understand this, and find Crazy Bob quite credible in his assumption
that I must be Graham,


GREAT! I start a thread last night about CRAZY BOB MOREIN, I check it
the next day, I find 16 messages and climbing, all about ME again. And
I haven't even had lunch yet. Next I'm sure I'm going to find some more
hypocritical accusations from Crazy Bob, Walt, you or many others,
complaining what an egomaniac I am, how all I do is talk about myself,
and how I'm "raping and pillaging RAO" (I believe those were your exact
words, Paul).

I wonder if anyone here in this thread has ever tried taking a look in
a mirror one time, just to see how pathetic they really are?


Frankly, I've never bought the evidence for you being Richard Graham,

Okay, so far that's:

NOT RICHARD GRAHAM: 1 (Paul)

IS RICHARD GRAHAM: 1 (Robert)

and seeing you posting every day, all day only increased my doubt.

Is that right? Pray tell oh wise Paul Packer, why the hell did you so
stupidly believe I was Dr. Graham in the first place? Because I once
said to Crazy Bob, "You sussed me out!"?

Are you proud of being that stupid and naive, Paul?

I
have no idea who you are, but I think it's time you stopped dancing
around with a lot of stuff about putting out hints etc and just told
us.

I'm not dancing, I'm writing. I'm "soundhaspriority", it's in all my
post headers. And even that doesn't matter, because its just a name. A
rose by another other name, would smell as sweet.

Whatever hints you've given, we didn't get it,

I hate it when you arrogant jackasses keep saying "we", like as though
you got the go-ahead to speak for the entire group. Speak for yourself,
Packer. At least two here did.

so if you clear up
the mystery obviously Robert can't continue to accuse you of being
Richard Graham.

Yeah right! There's another thing you're too dumb to get. First of all,
I have already established in several key threads, including "Message
to the ignorant pigs of RAO", that there is no such thing as "truth" on
this group. No such concept as "reason" or "rationality" that is
universally recognized. All of these things, if they appear, appear by
accident only. Rarely by intention. This means, besides the fact that
most of you are filthy habitual LIARS, what I or anyone says in this
realm doesn't mean anything. Perception is the only truth on RAO.
You're a shining example of that, being the mindless sheep that you
are, Paul.

Why do you think I'm "Richard Graham"? Simple: Robert Morein TOLD you
to think I'm Richard Graham. Did you reject that and decide to think
for yourself? No, you didn't. You did what most here did. Believe
whatever is the perceived truth. Morein, Ludovic and Shovels fought
hard to cement that perceived truth. But they didn't even need to for
your sake. You went "Baaaaa!" and believed it right from the beginning.
At one point, the perceived truth" was that I was May Belt.
Fortunately, that didn't stick for very long. But there were at last
count, over a dozen different other guesses. If I was everyone that you
and the other mindless sheep here convinced themselves I was, I'd be as
mad as Crazy Bob.

Now you say you gradually came to think for yourself and doubt Mad
Morein's word. But then you say if you don't receive a "perceived
truth" from me, then the "absolute truth" shall be whatever you
perceived before. And that's basically how you live your life. So what
if I tell you I'm this or that person, instead of Graham? There's no
reason for you to believe me, since you think I'm lying or deluded
about my tweaks. Like all other sheep here, you don't think. You just
think what makes it easier. (You believe whatever is easiest to
believe).

Secondly: because few if anyone abides by rules of reason and
rationality in this mad pig farm you dare to call a "discussion group",
you're a fool to think Morein can't continue to accuse me of being
Graham. There are several reasons why he can and WILL continue until
the day I leave, even if that is 10 years from now:

1) Like George Middius, Morein is a spineless rat coward, who wages
fierce wars against others that can last years, but only insofar as he
doesn't have to come out from behind his computer and leave his
father's basement. This means he won't ever admit I'm not Graham
because it would make him look like a FOOL to do so. Even though he
doesn't realize he already looks like a FOOL for continuing to make
this ridiculous claim. When I asked him for any evidence whatsoever
that I'm Graham, he continually ignored it. That should tell you right
there how honest Morein is with his beliefs that I'm Graham.

2) Another thing you're too dumb to get: Morein already KNOWS I'm not
Graham. Morein contacted Graham and Graham's colleagues in London (he
admitted as much publicly). Graham told Morein that he does not post to
Usenet. Fella also knows this because he emailed Graham, and Graham
told him the same thing. Morein also read PWB's site, where Graham
apologized to his newsletter readers that he was too busy to post to
PWB's chat group. Crazy Bob knows that if Graham is too busy to post to
PWB's chat room, you can damn well be sure he ain't posting all day
every day to RAO. Then there's the fact that he is a doctor and a
university professor and a family man, and has a very busy life. So Bob
knows that even if the real Dr. Graham wanted to post all day every day
to RAO, he COULDN'T.

3) SO WHY IS Robert Morein CONTINUING TO INSIST THAT I AM RICHARD
GRAHAM, IF HE ALREADY KNOWS SIX DIFFERENT WAYS THAT IT ISN'T TRUE?

Simple: The real purpose behind Crazy Bob Morein trashing an innocent
man, Dr. Richard Graham, is because Morein has a vendetta against me
for revealing what he said to me in an email between us, about having
tried my L-shape tweak. Robert Morein is, as I've said, PURPOSELESS
EVIL.

Robert is a sick fruitcake.

You would have to be, to be obsessed for 7 years with Brian McCarty,
who doesn't even bloody post on this newsgroup any longer, far as I can
tell, except for the odd forgery against Morein, once in a while.

Also, Robert hates me because Robert is a traditional audio engineer
registered with the IEEE. This makes me a #1 target in Crazy Bob's
eyes, because I advocate revolutionary audio ideas that makes the IEEE
look like they've been sleeping the last 50 years. Remember, Robert
KNOWS that my advanced audio ideas are valid (at least in the case of
the L-shape), but he doesn't want that known. This is why he lambasted
Sander and Fella for merely having tried my tweaks. He tried to make
them think they were fools, fooling themselves. This is why he goes
nuts every time that I post Belt's website address (ie.
http://belt.demon.co.uk) and cries "SHILL! THEIF! CRIMINAL! CRACK
ADDICT! MURDERER!" as loudly as possible in the hopes of anyone hearing
and believing him. Despite the fact that he was seen here shilling
PWB's products!

So he is trying to defame the good reputation of Dr. Graham, even
though he knows I'm not him, but simply because as the newsletter
editor, Graham is associated with PWB. Anyone associated with PWB is
fair game to Mad Morein, because it threatens everything he stands for,
and even his position with the IEEE (this is why Robert tried to
threaten me if I didn't retract what I revealed about him trying the
L-shape). I have of course since, retracted my retraction. Mad Morein
-did- try the L-shape, and I posted the email in which he admitted it.

Unless of course you want all this nonsense to go on
because you're enjoying it.

What a stupid comment. Thank you for confirming just how stupid you
are. If I wasn't enjoying the nonsense going on here, why in the blue
bloody hell would I be here, genius?

Another possibility
is that you are Richard Graham after all and can't prove otherwise.

Another possibility is that YOU are Richard Graham and can't prove
otherwise. Another possibility is Crazy Bob Morein is Richard Gere, and
can't prove otherwise. Another possibility is that Shovels is Pee Wee
Herman, and can't prove otherwise. Another possibility is that everyone
on the group is Ethel Merman, and can't prove otherwise.
Jeez, you're really not a very profound thinker, are you? I feel like
slapping you a couple of times in the head, grabbing you by the
shoulders and yelling "THINK, YOU IDIOT! **THINK**!".

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stop me if you think that youve heard this one before.
    ... And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham? ... enough alternatives to "Paul Packer", ... Robert Morein does so because he's a lowlife POS ... Mumbles to tell me that I "grind glass in my anus" yesterday? ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Dr. Richard Graham, usenet addict
    ... Dr. Richard Graham, you're a lifer. ... that's basically what Wackjob Bob is doing here with you. ... Morein has absolutely NO moral compass, NO sense of shame, and NO ... Wackjob Bob is REALLY laying on the bullshit! ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Richard Grahams lobe job
    ... Morein himself acknowledged ... people who have done nothing to Morein, such as Dr. Graham). ... I ignored Morein posting new attack threads against me during ... He's an addict, remember! ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Richard Grahams lobe job
    ... Morein himself acknowledged ... people who have done nothing to Morein, such as Dr. Graham). ... I ignored Morein posting new attack threads against me during ... He's an addict, remember! ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: The Deceptive Logic of Robert Moron (and RAO).
    ... Robert Morein ... For a brief example; I'm Dr. Richard Graham, ... pretty sad statement on what kind of SICK FOOLS you people have proven ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
Loading