Re: I applaud Arny Krueger
- From: packer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (paul packer)
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 23:36:59 GMT
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:41:14 -0500, "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Clyde Slick" <artsackman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44062d55$0$5504$b9f67a60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Lv6dnfCch6qlQpjZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jenn" <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jennconducts-BB7DB6.07154601032006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article
<1141202642.347870.239670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"NYOB123@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <NYOB123@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jenn wrote:
In article
<m13a029t508leiinvlbimp4aa15japv4ml@xxxxxxx>, George
M. Middius <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net> wrote:
Jenn said:
It's also an example of Art's delusions of grandeur
- he thinks he knows
about every piece of email I ever received in that
general time.
Arny, to save me from searching Google, please fill
me in on this. What
evidence do you have that Art has these fantasies?
You might also ask Arnii to recount the story of the
undercover kiddie porn
officer who visited him. ;-)
Arny, response?
Haven't you learned yet that nothing is as Middius
would have you believe?
If you want to know abolut this sorta stuff use Google.
So much for giving Arny a chance to defend himself. Oh
well.
This is just a veiled request from Jenn for a
recititation of George Middius's pedophile fantasies
about my late son, and I'm pretty sure that Jenn knows
it. :-(
Arny's account of his meeting with the MSP detective has
nothing to do with the death of his late son, nor any of
George's comments to that effect.
Had my son not died, George would have never repeatedly accused me of
killing him and sodomizing the body again and again. However George may
have accused me of sodomizing him while he was alive. George certainly did
accuse my wife of being a back alley whore and performing fellatio for hire
on numerous occasions.
Had George not repeatedly accused me of killing my son and repeatedly
sodomizing the dead body, its unlikely that the pornographic email ever been
sent to me. And were it not for George's track record of repeatedly
accusing me of killing my son and sodomizing the body again and again, I
would have never accused him of sending me the pornographic email.
Were there no pornographic email, I would have never had the MSP inspect it.
But, the pornographic email followed the pattern of George's many posts on
RAO about how I had killed my son and repeatedly sodomized the body.
How many times are you going to repeat the allegations in detail,
Arnie? Do you have any idea how immeasurably offensive even the
mention of such things is to most people (I mean people outside
RAO--the regular people). You should never have been subjected to such
disgusting suggestions and I'm quite hapy to apologise on behalf of
those who made them at the time. But surely continual repetition is
unwarranted and inappropriate, not to say sickening. How can you bear
it?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I applaud Arny Krueger
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: I applaud Arny Krueger
- References:
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- From: Clyde Slick
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- From: Jenn
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- From: Jenn
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- From: NYOB123@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- From: Jenn
- Re: I applaud Arny Krueger
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: I applaud Arny Krueger
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: I condemn Arny Krueger
- Prev by Date: Re: Clarification
- Next by Date: Re: Clarification
- Previous by thread: Re: I applaud Arny Krueger
- Next by thread: Re: I applaud Arny Krueger
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|