Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: Jenn <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:32:58 GMT
In article <1140546833.801595.247540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"vlad" <vova.kuznetsov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jenn wrote:
In article <1140543192.644314.279920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"vlad" <vova.kuznetsov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jenn wrote:
In article <1140528833.945891.16090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"124" <rooggadsee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jenn wrote:
What is it about having to see the device that improves the sound?
Nothing.
The next question is very closely related to the previous question.
Does knowing the identity of a device affect the sound quality?
--124
Nope.
Of course, it does, Jenn. You are a live example of it. Don't you
prefer LP's?
I am sure that in a test that hides identity of the the media you would
fail miserably.
vlad
Let's be clear: You are stating that knowing the identity of a device
affects the actual sound quality? Wow.
Nope, you are wrong, unfortunately. Knowing the identity of the device
affects perception of sound quality. Do you agree?
vlad
But that wasn't the question, Vlad. The question was, "Does knowing the
identity of a device AFFECT THE SOUND QUALITY?" Whether or not one
knows the identity of the device, the sound itself does not change,
wouldn't you agree?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: Steven Sullivan
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: vlad
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- References:
- Unbiased Listening
- From: 124
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: Jenn
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: 124
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: Jenn
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: vlad
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: Jenn
- Re: Unbiased Listening
- From: vlad
- Unbiased Listening
- Prev by Date: Re: The Limits of the LP
- Next by Date: Re: The Limits of the LP
- Previous by thread: Re: Unbiased Listening
- Next by thread: Re: Unbiased Listening
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
