Re: L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- From: "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:57:27 -0500
"Powell" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1iOGf.36$MA7.17@xxxxxxxx
"Steven Sullivan" wrote
That interesting but 1983 Monster cable is>>Your suggestion was investigated by L.Below is a more accurate summary of the article,
>>Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51.
>>
reprinted from an old post I made on RAHE...a
thread that Dr. Mirabilis also posted to:
30 foot lengths were used.
1) monster vs. ....
not really relevant to consumers today.
More than 20 years later some still don't like
the implementation of their cable technology,
do you?
At audio frequencies and with any kind of reasonble speaker load, wire of a
given gauge = wire of a given gauge. Since wire gauges haven't changed
since 1983...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- From: Powell
- Re: L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- References:
- L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- From: Fella
- Re: L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- From: Steven Sullivan
- Re: L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- From: Powell
- L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- Prev by Date: Re: The Line Between Reality and Delusion?
- Next by Date: Re: plug and listen
- Previous by thread: Re: L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- Next by thread: Re: L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|