The Krooger Problem
- From: George M. Middius <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:26:11 -0500
paul packer said:
> > Wrong word. Perhaps you meant viciousness? rancorous? venomous? malevolent?
> > I could go on, but I'm sure you used the wrong word.
> Well, according to my dictionary vindictive means revengeful, and
> that's pretty much what I had in mind.
I don't feel vindictive toward Mr. Shit. Appalled, disgusted, revulsed,
sickened ... but not vindictive.
> I was thinking of your response
> to attack, but I agree I should have been more general. As a master of
> words, perhaps you should be left to describe yourself, as I'm sure you
> have a truckload of self-awareness. :-)
Since you asked, I would characterize my posts about Krooshit as
meritorious denunciations of filthfulness.
> > Krooger is markedly deficient in all continua where talent can be observed.
> > No shame in calling a 'borg a 'borg.
> That's a little mean. Arnie has talents; he just has no imagination, no
> self-awareness and almost no sense of humour.
I'll agree with the latter two, but as to Krooger's alleged talents, I
haven't seen any. Certainly not in the area of social interaction,
ability to express himself, or artistic design (have you seen his
horrible web sites?). He can't reason abstractly, he's a compulsive
liar, and then there's the whole paranoia thing that drives him to
*argue with himself* on many occasions. From what I've seen, he's
terrible at imparting the fragments of knowledge he's gleaned: Aside
from the incessant snottiness, every time the discussion turns even
slightly technical, he gets tripped up, and then the "debating trade"
dance begins. Mr. Shit has never designed a single audio component,
notwithstanding his incessant bleating about the flaws of other people's
designs. His understanding of "tests" is a joke, according to some
genuine experts in the field. And I'm sure you've seen the admixture of
random nonsense and lies the Krooborg tries to sell as "science".
So tell me, paulie, what are Krooger's "talents"?
> > Besides, all one has to do in order to calibrate the scale is observe the
> > quality of thought characteristic of those who rally 'round Mr. Shit.
>
> Well, there's truth in that. However, my opinion of Mike and one or two
> others is not as severe as yours. Come to think of it, my opinion of
> everything is not as severe as yours.
Usenet is a good way to blow off steam.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Krooger Problem
- From: paul packer
- Re: The Krooger Problem
- References:
- Question for duh-Mikey
- From: George M . Middius
- [Meta] George's Abusive Posts
- From: 124
- Re: [Meta] George's Abusive Posts
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: [Meta] George's Abusive Posts
- From: 124
- Re: [Meta] George's Abusive Posts
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: [Meta] George's Abusive Posts
- From: dave weil
- Re: George's Abusive Posts
- From: paul packer
- Re: George's Abusive Posts
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: George's Abusive Posts
- From: paul packer
- Question for duh-Mikey
- Prev by Date: Re: George's Abusive Posts
- Next by Date: Ego [Was]: Re: George's Abusive Posts
- Previous by thread: Re: George's Abusive Posts
- Next by thread: Re: The Krooger Problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|