The honest truth about stereo
- From: "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Jan 2006 23:28:17 -0800
In the past few years, serious mono listening has had a resurgence of
sorts in the underground DIY audio world. A few have gone so far as to
go over to mono exclusively, most have built themselves a separate mono
playback chain so they don't feel asymmetric about listening to a
speaker on the left or right.
How much of a benefit is stereo, really, in accurately reproducing
music recorded live in physical space, the sine qua non of audiophilia?
I would say that good stereo is a good thing, but that in reproducing
recordings properly intended for mono , mono loses less than most
moderns believe in total quality. The fact is that unless one is
actually in a band, or is listening in special circumstances-really
large theater organ installations or the quintessential example, the
Alpenhorn on the left and the villagers in the valley on the right-most
listening to music is far more monophonic than one would think. It's
film and special effects and ambient recordings, not music, that
benefit primarily from stereo.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The honest truth about stereo
- From: dizzy
- Re: The honest truth about stereo
- From: nyob123
- Re: The honest truth about stereo
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: The honest truth about stereo
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: The honest truth about stereo
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Stereo Necessary?
- Next by Date: Re: Question for McIntosh buffs
- Previous by thread: Question on Denon home theater receivers
- Next by thread: Re: The honest truth about stereo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|