Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: <nyob123@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:21:38 GMT
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136861324.950165.192020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> surf wrote:
>> <nyob123@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>>
>> > By defining hi-fi as something that doesn't audibly distort?
>> > By maintaining that the truth is the truth and that audio conforms to
>> > known laws of physics?
>>
>> Do you think that people interested in SETs welcome this
>> advice at all?
>
> He doesn't, which is all the more reason to offer it. Nothing like
> being a general purpose high hard one.
>
Nice to have an expert opinion.
.
- References:
- The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: RapidRonnie
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: Robert Morein
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: Bret Ludwig
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: Bret Ludwig
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: nyob123
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: surf
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: nyob123
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: surf
- Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- From: Bret Ludwig
- The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- Prev by Date: Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- Next by Date: Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- Previous by thread: Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- Next by thread: Re: The sociopathy of Krüger, explained
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|