Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- From: packer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (paul packer)
- Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:43:07 GMT
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 20:23:54 -0500, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:
>
>
>paul packer said:
>
>> >Krooger and duh-Mikey are genuinely objectionable. Suggestions on
>> >eradicating their presence are welcome.
>
>> The trouble is, George, that they have a similar opinion of you, and
>> would wish for similar suggestions. How to please everybody? :-)
>
>Let's get this on the record, paulie. Are you affirmatively declaring that
>you desire or intend to "please" Krooger and the Bug Eater?
No more than I desire or intend to "please" you, George.
Now I ask you, what am I to do? The other day I had an email from an
ex-poster seriously assuring me you were insane, and since I had no
evidence to the contrary I just let the matter rest. So clearly there
are lurkers and posters as doubtful of your sanity as you are of
Arny's. Maybe instead of IQ tests we should have reality checks here,
to sort out the near-insane from the totally-far-gone. Then, depending
on the results, I'll cast a vote for one side or the other. :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- References:
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- From: Sander deWaal
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- From: paul packer
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- From: paul packer
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- Prev by Date: Re: Belts are the accepted norm
- Next by Date: Re: The curse of the Terrierborg: corruption
- Previous by thread: Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- Next by thread: Re: ABX is not DBT's Siamese twin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|