Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: Jenn <jennconducts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:46:17 GMT
In article <1125342495.131396.101360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
> > In article <a4wQe.98669$Ep.6555@lakeread02>,
> > "ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> > > wrote
> > > in message news:5ug4h19q7efusa4bf38rrlu2o7gaf19lfp@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Terrierborg, why don't you admit you lied yesterday?
> > > >
> > > >> > I'm sure that matters a great deal. Some pasty-faced sack of
> > > >> > potatotes
> > > >> > from California saying "goodbye" to the Big Easy... Not exactly a
> > > >> > noteworthy event. You'd be better off trundling down to the animal
> > > >> > shelter
> > > >> > to get your nose licked by some strays.
> > > >>
> > > >> Poor George....why do you let "some pasty-faced sack of potatoes"
> > > >> inspire you to such vitriol?
> > > >
> > > > Still can't admit you lied, I see.
> > >
> > > I could.... but I would be lying.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Were you drunk when you made that misbegotten post about Stereophile?
> > > >
> > > > And FYI, this is very low octane vitriol, at least for me.
> > >
> > > I know.
> > > Note to Jenn: follow this link if you want to understand the depth of
> > > George's vitriol. Its a bit profane so be warned.
> >
> > Note to Scott: That's not my argument.
>
> Funny thing about usenet.... we all suffer to some degree when vitriol
> is unchecked. Evil flourishes when good men (and women) do nothing.
>
> ScottW
I understand your point, Scott. I'm simply pointing out that I've not
been part of the George vs Others argument. I find it all quite
distasteful, to say the least. I wasn't defending George, per se, when
I pointed out the flaw in your other post.
But on your present point, I will say this: Yes, I understand your
paragraph above. I'm relatively new to this NG, so I don't know who
started the vitriol between George and Arny, et al, nor am I about to
spend time going to Google to search what I presume would be hundreds
(thousands?) of posts. I don't have a horse in this race. Though I
agree, in general, with George's views in matters audio, I think that
both sides are acting like badly behaved children.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- References:
- OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: George M . Middius
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: ScottW
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: Jenn
- Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- From: ScottW
- OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- Prev by Date: Re: Stereophile
- Next by Date: Re: Stereophile
- Previous by thread: Re: Those darn fleas! ;-)
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Good Luck New Orleans
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|