Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: "Austin Becker" <beckerhead@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:54:40 GMT
You can't use the "not everyone can afford" argument with me when they guy
is blatantly going out to buy ridiculous amounts of gear. I already posted
the math on this stuff. The argument that I am making with this kid is that
just because you add more speakers does not mean the clarity will get
better. In fact, this will lead to ALL KINDS of phase issues creating
cancellation he's never even dreamed about. He wants to fiberglass this
setup in, which is going to be far more laborious and expensive than
fiberglassing maybe the 4 6x9's and the subs. The fact that the opening
thread specifically mentioned the savings in weight that he would be getting
using fiberglass over MDF becomes null and void when you buy as many
speakers as you can fit in the car. If every comment the kid makes didn't
contradict the last comment he made, I would be less inclined to say much.
Typically I could care less if someone is buying cheap equipment for a
"great" system, because they usually aren't going to put 85 speakers in one
car either (sarcasm). But the fact that this guy is actually saying things
like "I want two 10's, and two 15's but I don't want to blow the roof off"
is asinine, as well as the fact that since "soundstorm 6x9's have crystal
clarity, I am going to add 6 more 6x9's to my setup and put 1400W amplifiers
on them." Does this not seem like fallacious reasoning to you? And not to
mention that those figures are for max power, not for RMS, so in reality
it's 700W RMS which is likely blown far out of reality. It's easy for
someone who hasn't heard really nice equipment to say that their setup is
great, but the fact that this kid actually has compared Pyle and audiobahn
to one another confirms my theories. Who ever said audiobahn is a good
speaker is what I'd like to know. Talk about ratings blown from reality.
--
- AUSTIN BECKER
"MOSFET" <ntanner@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Sd2dnZCoL_n9g2XenZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And BOSS audio is shit. That is anotherSorry
reason that I think that you've no idea what you're talking about. You
could spend the same amount of money on far less speakers of superior
quality and have twice the clarity (in my opinion) than that shit.
IMHO,if
you don't like my opinion, but don't post on public newsgroups if you
don't
want someone else's input be it critical or complimentary.
You know, he wasn't asking your opinion about the quality of Boss amps so
your "don't post on public newsgroups if you don't want...." argument is
really pretty ridiculous. Unless someone is asking your OPINION about
something, I really don't think unsolicited comments are called for.
it seems rude and frankly, petty.build
If you don't like something about someone's system, simply DON'T ANSWER
THEIR QUESTION. Not everyone can afford the best stuff, and yet they are
still VERY PROUD OF THEIR SYSTEM. That's what makes this sport great, you
don't need tons of money to get into it, and there's COUNTLESS ways to
a system (some will be untraditional). If you don't like this fact, go
start your own Usenet group, for instance: rec.audio.high-end.car.
MOSFET
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: Brandonb
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: justin time
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: MOSFET
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- References:
- Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: justin time
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: Cyrus
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: justin time
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: Austin Becker
- Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- From: MOSFET
- Fiberglass speaker construction
- Prev by Date: Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- Next by Date: Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- Previous by thread: Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- Next by thread: Re: Fiberglass speaker construction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|