Re: Hey, WQ? How's that electoral map looking for ya?
- From: FDR <fdr@kjdfgkdfkl>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:05:23 -0400
WhoRU? wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:41:59 -0700 (PDT), WQ <WQieue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13 pm, WhoRU? <M...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:00:26 -0700 (PDT), WQ <WQi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:--- What are you senselessly babbling about? Anyone who knows
WhoRU? wrote:You just don't get it do you? This has nothing to do with who actually winshttp://www.electoral-vote.com/--- It's just a blip for now. With what's going on in Texas and how
Just wondering if today's new map makes you feel embarrassed/stupid at all
after your countless posts proclaiming the US election was over? I mean
most everyone already ridicules your lack of knowledge about TV. It's no
wonder your political acumen is just as bad.
This isn't meant to gloat about McCain leading Obama. It doesn't mean any
more now than it did a week ago during all your proclamations. It does
make you look even more stupid.
Bush is going to screw things up there in the coming weeks, expect
Obama to win that state by default, which will put him safely over the
top. With the financial rumblings going on at Wall St., and don't
think that's anywhere over now, people are really going to start
thinking about their money in ways they haven't yet and will see that
McCain has no real vision to protect the economy [his plan is to
actually increase the debt $1.3 trillion more than Obama's]. With the
whole Troopergate fiasco, Palin probably won't be around much in
October, if at all. Even the vice president debate will help put a
nail in her coffin. So I'm not worried at this point. It's still a
case of see-saw up-and-down. Ask me again around the middle of
October. With any luck, Americans will have regained their sanity by
then - the McCain-Palin sideshow will have been just that.
the November election. It has to do with your inane posts. You just did
the same thing here you always do when your opinion about TV gets called in
to question. You make out like it must be other people at fault for your
own lack of acumen. You were using that site as some sort of proof for your
opinion while everyone else was telling you it meant nothing. Just as it
does now.
anything about how American politics works knows that the electoral
vote is all that counts. Not what you think, what I think, what the
polls say, not even who gets the most popular vote. So if you're
going to talk about the election, the electoral vote is the bottom
line and final word.
You really prove just how stupid you are with every post don't you? Do you
happen to know how the electoral votes get counted, genius? Hint, they go
by the popular vote which hasn't happened yet.
No, if it was based on the popular vote then Gore would have easily won in 2000.
.
I bet you still think Thomas Dewey was elected president in 1948.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Hey, WQ? How's that electoral map looking for ya?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: ED KOCH endorses OBAMA
- Previous by thread: Re: Hey, WQ? How's that electoral map looking for ya?
- Next by thread: Re: Hey, WQ? How's that electoral map looking for ya?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
