Re: Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- From: WQ <wq@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 24, 11:16 am, David <dimla...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT), WQ <w...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fromwww.tvweek.com
'Scrubs' Resuscitation Likely on ABC
"Scrubs" returned to production to finish a pre-writers strike episode
for NBC as well as to make a handful of new episodes likely to be
picked up by ABC, the Hollywood Reporter says, citing people it didn't
identify. ABC will probably order the medical comedy's eighth season
once the actors' contracts are finalized, the newspaper says. Both
networks declined to comment, the Reporter says.
--- This makes absolutely no sense at all. NBC's bottom-rated show,
next to Friday Night Lights, is being covetously treated like some
kind of a highly sought-after Top 10 hit by ABC
There's a hole in your logic.
(and yes, in honor of these being the holidays, I'm suggesting that
you're actually using logic)
--- Aside from whatever tiresome, meaningless claim you keep making
about 18-49 as being relevant [oh, by the way, I heard on CNN that 30%
of 18-39ers (39ers, not 49ers, so that makes the demo even younger)
are financially dependent on their parents these days, meaning that
18-49 numbers are worth about 1/3 less in value], it'd be nice to know
what that other "hole" is in my logic. Ejekate me.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- From: David
- Re: Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- References:
- Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- From: WQ
- Re: Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- From: David
- Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- Prev by Date: Re: Richardson Endorses Obama
- Next by Date: Re: McCain will do what Bush didn't do
- Previous by thread: Re: Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- Next by thread: Re: Scrub "Scrubs" Already
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
