Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Aug 2007 10:49:32 GMT
Richard Evans <infodex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"bklyntv@xxxxxxxxx" <bklyntv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
spoilers if you haven't seen it yet.
I thought it was a very good episode. This show's taking off (at least
in my eyes), I'm starting to look forward to it.
Tom was a dumb ass to cave to Patty though. At the very least he
should have insisted on his name on the firm. I think he was stupid to
come back into Patty's fold. I imagine she'll make him pay for his
disloyalty.
Also didn't really buy Tom trying to poach Ellen. How much help can a
first year attorney really be?
I couldn't buy the whole idea that Tom was taking on the Frobisher
case all by himself, with no staff and no office. Patty had all of her
resources working around the clock on it. What can one guy do by
himself?
I agree with you. Nothing in that episode rang true.
Frobisher is paying off the lead plaintiff. Is that the lawyer he told
him to hire? Or was it simply coincidental that the other plaintiffs
pushed to hire Tom, which turned out to be in Frobisher's interest?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- From: Ian Galbraith
- Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- From: Holly
- Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- References:
- Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- From: bklyntv@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- From: Richard Evans
- Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- Prev by Date: Re: Mad Men
- Next by Date: Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- Previous by thread: Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- Next by thread: Re: Damages 8/21 (spoilers)
- Index(es):