Re: Least Necessary Network
- From: Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:23:13 -0700
In article <tdmdnYOjZ9pcriHZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
pete@xxxxxxx (Pete Moss) wrote:
In article <6ocob2l91v6lvbea9ncegv5bh98iqngrt9@xxxxxxx>, nanoflower@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:56:32 GMT, pete@xxxxxxx (Pete Moss) wrote:
G4 or Spike TV?
I can't decide.
G4. It died a few years ago. If they hadn't killed off all the Tech Tv
programming and gotten rid of all the people they might have grown the
viewership, but they just wanted the slots on the satellites and got
rid of everything from TechTv over time.
It seems to me like G4 is trying to emulate Spike TV.
All I've seen on G4 is the incredibly stupid Star Trek 2.0. I didn't
even sample any more of their programming.
.
- References:
- Least Necessary Network
- From: Pete Moss
- Re: Least Necessary Network
- From: shawn
- Re: Least Necessary Network
- From: Pete Moss
- Least Necessary Network
- Prev by Date: Re: Few more pilots online
- Next by Date: Re: Comcast commercial bumping
- Previous by thread: Re: Least Necessary Network
- Next by thread: Comcast commercial bumping
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
