Re: A question about Murdoch and the startup of FOX Cable
- From: adykes@xxxxxxxxx (Al Dykes)
- Date: 31 May 2006 16:02:33 -0400
In article <9vqr72h95p51q6bu43gvl9haosvl5ljrfb@xxxxxxx>,
<akjack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 31 May 2006 14:45:47 -0400, adykes@xxxxxxxxx (Al Dykes) wrote:
ISTR reading that to get FOX Cable going, Murdock had to pay every
cable operator a few bucks a head upfront to get a channel and this
was somehow shocking at the time.
Can someone point me to a URL or publication that support that, or
tell me that my recollector is broken.
Thanks
Fox Cable? Do you mean Fox News Channel or Fox Movie Channel?
Why do you care? Why does it matter?
The origianl Murdoch cable rollout. I recall reading it and am
looking for a citation for a discussion of what it costs to start up a
new media organization.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. Proudly then, even more so in hindsight.
.
- References:
- A question about Murdoch and the startup of FOX Cable
- From: Al Dykes
- Re: A question about Murdoch and the startup of FOX Cable
- From: akjack
- A question about Murdoch and the startup of FOX Cable
- Prev by Date: Re: Alias - should I watch seasons 3 and 4 - before watching 5?
- Next by Date: Re: "Joey" unaired episodes
- Previous by thread: Re: A question about Murdoch and the startup of FOX Cable
- Next by thread: Re: A question about Murdoch and the startup of FOX Cable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
