Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics <jetgraphics@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 20:34:00 -0500
FDR wrote:
No, you fail to recognize the difference between a "marriage" that joins
genetic bloodlines AND property rights, with a consensual agreement
(adoption, will) that transfers property rights.
Since gay couples can't merge bloodlines, they can't use a marriage to
pass
property to one of the partner's natural child, (or adopted child).
What you fail to understand is that straight people can marry and never
have
kids, or transfer of a bloodline.
The point is that the marriage connects them to the laws for passing private
property to their children, without the need for a will to exist. So if one
or both die intestate, the State has ZERO claim to their property. If there
are children, they get the family private property. If not, the blood kin
get their private property.
Under Nat Soc, the State grabs as much as it can.
Some don't want children, some are
incapable physically of having children. Under your definition, those
straight people can't get married.
You misunderstand the point. The pre-Socialist benefits of marriage were in
regard to private property rights. Post Socialism, the "benefits" of
socialist marriage included access to entitlements and privileges, but not
private property rights.
And what happens in the near future when through the miracle of genetic
science, two women can have kids together? Can they get married then? Or
will it just come down to the religious right to still deny them the
ability to marry?
If same gender can ever meld their DNA, they would benefit from the
"automatic" property right laws of marriage for their progeny - if they
weren't socialists.
Otherwise, they can rely upon compact, will or statutory provisions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: FDR
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: FDR
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: FDR
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: FDR
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: FDR
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: FDR
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: Jet Graphics
- Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- From: FDR
- Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- Prev by Date: Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- Next by Date: Tony Sopranos Dream Shot
- Previous by thread: Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- Next by thread: Re: Boston Legal vents against "the System" - NOT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading