Re: Without a Trace: General Question
- From: "bklyntv@xxxxxxxxx" <bklyntv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2006 12:21:54 -0800
SpencerDogg wrote:
> On Jan 31 2006 3:28 PM, bklyntv@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > I thought one couldn't make a missing person's report on an adult until
> > they are missing 48 hours when there's no evidence of foul play.
> >
> > But again and again the team is on the scene right away. A recent
> > example, the teacher who ran off with the kid was being investigated 12
> > hours missing. But there was no indication of foul play, just the
> > school's report she'd not shown for her morning classes.
> >
> > Are they just stretching the truth for dramatic effect? Or is 48 hours
> > not really the rule?
>
> It's a TV show.
And you're on a tv board, what's your point?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Without a Trace: General Question
- From: cloud dreamer
- Re: Without a Trace: General Question
- References:
- Without a Trace: General Question
- From: bklyntv@xxxxxxxxx
- Without a Trace: General Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Craig Ferguson
- Next by Date: Re: Overnight Ratings - Monday 1/30/06
- Previous by thread: Without a Trace: General Question
- Next by thread: Re: Without a Trace: General Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|