Re: New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- From: Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:34:00 -0600
On 23 Dec 2005 02:16:32 -0500, wdstarr@xxxxxxxxx (William December
Starr) wrote:
>In article <1135259369.789562.70210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>"stonej" <stonej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
>> By law magazines have to disclose their circulation figures
>> (including subscriptions) once a year and print it in the magazine
>> itself (usually buried in the back among the classified ads etc.)
>> This is most often done in Nov. (for the magazines I read anyway)
>
>Just as a technicality, I *think* it's "magazines that want to
>qualify for special, favorable 'bulk periodical' postage rates,"
>not "all magazines."
>
>I could be wrong of course, but the concept makes sense to me: if
>it wasn't a voluntary "if you want this benefit, you have to reveal
>this proprietary data" deal such a requirement would probably run
>afoul of the First Amendment's freedom of the press clause.
FTR, DC Comics ships its subscription copies via a different class of
mail than the bulk periodical class specifically so that they don't
have to publish this circulation data.
-- Rob
--
LORELAI: In the movie, only boy hobbits travel to Mount
Doom, but that's only because the girls went to do something
even more dangerous.
GIRL: What?
LORELAI: Have you ever heard of a Brazilian Bikini Wax?
.
- References:
- New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- From: WQ
- Re: New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- From: Erin Woodbridge's Bestest Friend, Ian J. Ball
- Re: New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- From: stonej
- Re: New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- From: William December Starr
- New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- Prev by Date: Re: New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- Next by Date: Re: Odd coincidence
- Previous by thread: Re: New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- Next by thread: Re: New TV Guide a Sales Success! Sort of.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|