Re: Deal or no deal
- From: "Steven L." <sdlitvin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:22:28 GMT
Default User wrote:
Steven L. wrote:
Default User wrote:
Here is how it was presented in the question to her column:
In September of 1991 a reader of Marilyn Vos Savant's Sunday Parade column wrote in and asked the following question:
"Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the other doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, 'Do you want to pick door No. 2?' Is it to your advantage to take the switch?"
Notice that it makes no reference to LMAD at all.
The original question might have, but the specific reference may have been edited out by Ms. Savant for some reason. To anyone reading her column, it would still be obvious what game show the writer was asking about. He sure wasn't talking about Jeopardy.
True, but relatively irrelevant. Either the situation as described would arise on the show, in which a contestant should follow her advice, or it never did. If it never did, then the question is moot, as you can't follow her advice for a situation that doesn't occur.
What part of the words "idealized case" didn't you understand?
This was an idealized and deliberately simplified case, with the messy details left out even though a full game analysis would require those details. It's no different than reading a book on chess in which they discuss pins and other tactics, even though the total board configuration may not be exactly the same as the situation you'll face in your next game. If that were not so, then there would be no point in reading books on chess because they'll never deal with the exact games you're liable to play in your own life.
-- Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. .
- References:
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: CircularReference
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: Lord Vader III
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: mikeha . ca
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: Steven L.
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: ANIM8Rfsk
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: Steven L.
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: ANIM8Rfsk
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: Default User
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: ANIM8Rfsk
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: Default User
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: Steven L.
- Re: Deal or no deal
- From: Default User
- Re: Deal or no deal
- Prev by Date: Re: Women more leftwing than men
- Next by Date: Spielberg should do Hitler's life story
- Previous by thread: Re: Deal or no deal
- Next by thread: Re: Deal or no deal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|