Re: GL Why did they SORAS Leah?
- From: "TheBahboo" <TheDarkPhoenix@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 12:58:41 -0700
Dana Carpender wrote:
We've seen her, what, three or four times since she came back to town?
What was the point of SORASing her so violently, and screwing up piles
of backstory and the whole timeline, if Leah wasn't going to have a
story? I don't get it.
And if we needed teens with lots of connections in SF, why not bring
back Peter Jessup? Reva actually spoke of Bridget and Dylan the other
day, and all I could think was, "Geez, isn't it time for little Peedie
to show up as a hunky teen?" If he could bring his mother with him,
that would be a bonus; I loved Melissa Hayden.
Think of the connections! He's Reva and Billy's step-grandson through
Dylan, he's Blake's nephew, and the child of Dinah's ex-lover. He's
RJ's half-brother, which gives him a connection to Cassie's whole
family. He's a quasi-son of Vanessa's.
And speaking of Vanessa, Maureen Reardon should be about ready for a
torrid summer romance, too. Bringing back either of these kids would
have made a lot more sense than SORASing Leah to such a ridiculous
extent, especially since they don't appear to have a story for the girl.
Hey, I just had a thought. Since Peter would, indeed, have a tie to
Cassie's family, what if he and Tammy started to fall for each other?
Like mother like daughter, and all that...
Dana
As usual, your ideas are way better than what the idiots in charge are
doing.
.
- References:
- GL Why did they SORAS Leah?
- From: Dana Carpender
- GL Why did they SORAS Leah?
- Prev by Date: Re: ATWT --- Luke SPOILER
- Next by Date: Re: ATWT - Are They Serious?????
- Previous by thread: Re: GL Why did they SORAS Leah?
- Next by thread: Re: The birds and the bees - Soap style
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
