Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: record.hunter@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Dec 2005 10:04:12 -0800
Donna B wrote:
> In rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs on 28 Dec 2005 20:35:39 -0800 in Msg.#
> <1135830939.174643.292030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> record.hunter@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > KC wrote:
> > > On 28 Dec 2005 18:58:53 -0800, record.hunter@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > >I loved the parts of the show I watched: Lucinda and Meg (though I
> > > >wondered if Meg's poor grammar is written that way, or is it the
> > > >actress?)
> > >
> > > Wait, wait, poor grammar??!! What did she say? What did I miss? This
> > > episode just got more interesting!
> >
> > I think it was during a couple of the Lucinda scenes; she was yakking
> > about "Me and him did this," which I was willing to let go by, but she
> > followed it later with a "for Dusty and I," which just curdled my
> > plaque.
>
> Probably my one all-time pet peeve, nominative & objective case!! But, very
> very common. And, almost always the actors own errors.
Misspellings drive me as insane as grammatical errors. Most common, and
to me, most egregious, are "definately" instead of "definitely," and
when people spell the verb "lose" as if it were the adjective "loose."
They're so common, I've come to think of people who use them correctly
as virtual geniuses in this internet age.
Now, how many mistakes did I make? (It always happens that way.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: KC
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- References:
- ATWT/ Wed.
- From: Phyllis Stone
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: record . hunter
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: KC
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: record . hunter
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: KC
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: record . hunter
- Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- From: Donna B
- ATWT/ Wed.
- Prev by Date: Re: Y&R- Why Is No One Stating The Obvious?
- Next by Date: Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- Previous by thread: Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- Next by thread: Re: ATWT/ Wed.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading