Re: GL/wedding
- From: Dana Carpender <dcarpend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:58:30 GMT
KC wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:02:02 GMT, "SarahE" <estell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Primrose" <primroseN-NOSPAM@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:MPG.1df606b47766a5af989d0d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <xMTif.27800$tV6.1958@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nobody@xxxxxxx says...
No one has commented on the wedding. Some of it was annoying.
Yeah...how many weddings have you gone to where they ask if anyone objects to the wedding a dozen times. I got to the point where I FF'd through that question a few times, it was so annoying.
They didn't ask a dozen times - they asked once and showed different people's reaction to the question. Yes, we heard the question multiple times, but I think it was meant to be asked once - if you were at the wedding - but showing the reactions and thoughts of different people hearing it and contemplating it.
I thought the wedding was incredibly well done. And I swear that if Pelfrey does not get an Emmy this year there is simply no justice in the world. That guy does more with a look than most daytime actors do with pages of dialogue.
SarahE
In today's episode, with the beautiful night shots outside the church, Pelphrey's face full-frame, made me think, "THAT needs to be coming soon to a Cineplex near you"
If Pelphrey doesn't become a major, major star, I will lose all faith in the notion of meritocracy.
Dana .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GL/wedding
- From: SarahE
- Re: GL/wedding
- References:
- GL/wedding
- From: Phyllis Stone
- Re: GL/wedding
- From: Primrose
- Re: GL/wedding
- From: SarahE
- Re: GL/wedding
- From: KC
- GL/wedding
- Prev by Date: Re: GL/wedding
- Next by Date: Re: GL..Terrible!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: GL/wedding
- Next by thread: Re: GL/wedding
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
