Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- From: SFJason <sfjaysin@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 1, 12:01 pm, Seth J. Bookey <sethb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In <fa28f363-320f-4696-9c7d-1188d9987...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> SFJason <sfjay...@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Jul 1, 10:24 am, deneph <stewart1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can someone please remind my why Natalie chose to lie and continue theReason 1) She was hot for him and wanted to have teh sechs with him
farce that Jared was a Buchanen?
(which is vile because she actually believed he was her uncle)
The show was very careful to have her attracted to and with Jared BEFORE
he was revealed to be her "uncle" and nothing physically sexual started
until he reveaed he wasn't. I am not sure why everyone is so vitriolic on
this issue. It's not like the libido is a switch. If she was attracted to
Jared before it he was paraded out at her uncle, then could she reasonably
be expected to turn off her feelings? Acting on them is one thing, having
the feelings is another.
--Seth
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seth J. Bookey
New York City
sethb...@xxxxxxxxx
I get what you are saying Seth, but it's still icky. Just as icky as
when Tina thought David Vickers was her brother and she was having sex
fantasies about him. I remember how grossed out Luna was when Tina
confessed her feelings about David. It was pretty funny.
SFJason
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- From: Mary B
- Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- From: Seth J . Bookey
- Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- From: Brother Love
- Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- References:
- OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- From: deneph
- Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- From: SFJason
- Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- From: Seth J . Bookey
- OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- Prev by Date: Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- Next by Date: Re: OLTL: Tina's return (hate to say it...)
- Previous by thread: Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- Next by thread: Re: OLTL: Nat's reasoning...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading