Re: #Why "Obamaism" will fail spectacularly"

In article
<f1ec9d70-302a-4945-941d-2c9b407612b1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"bvallely@xxxxxxx" <bvallely@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<666065b5-e3ee-4c83-9cf0-2a31cf36e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,



 "bvall...@xxxxxxx" <bvall...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 26, 4:49 pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<19d1ed6f-02b4-4d1b-901d-8c98299de...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

 "bvall...@xxxxxxx" <bvall...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
.
I do like Sarah Palin.  She's not a turkey.
.
Oh yes she is
.
She's a mother of five who chose to carry a child with Down Syndrome.

She's run a fishing boat in Alaska.

Without any connections whatsoever, she became a mayor and a governor.

As Governor, she has an 80% approval rating.

Not any more she doesn't. That approval rating dropped a huge 20% in the
first few weeks of her VP campaign. >
.
No, it went from 80% to 68% - a 12 point drop.  Not entirely
surprising, considering that the Establishment media went after her
more viciously than I've ever seen before.  At the time the 68% was
taken, there were several "investigations" going on about her, (which
have since cleared her)

Another lie. The 1st investigation found her guilty of breaking Alaskan
ethics law.
.
The first investigator was a party hack, and even he found Sarah
innocent of violating state law. Of course, the second, REAL
investigators, completely vindicated Sarah.

The first investigation was authorized by a bipartisan committee, mainly
made up of Republicans and thus the Republicans would have been
principally responsible for hiring the investigator. The 2nd
investigation was run by people appointed by Palin. Sorry, but there
will be no rewriting of history by you (or anybody else).

As for the first investigator, he said that she had the power to fire
the guy for any reason, even the lame-ass one of firing him because he
wouldn't fire her ex-brother-in-law (which he said was probably part of
the reason). And he said that all the pressure put on the guy by The
First Dude and numerous Palin staffers was indeed an illegal ethics
violation. That's the facts, so claiming it's not so is useless.


 the National Enquirer launched a series of
smear pieces and she was attacked daily.
.
The National Enquirier???!!!!! You're referencing a supermarket tabloid?
.
Yup.
.
I'd say you must be joking, but, sadly, I fear you're not.>
.
I don't see much of a difference between the Enquirer and the New York
Times these days.

Yeah, that's your problem right there.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Obama would have lost if...
    ... Well, yea. ... If the Republicans had done a good job the last eight ... years there would have been no reason to fire them. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Licensing and Registration....NEVER!!!
    ... NYC should also go by the wayside as will the ban in government ... government license before you excercised your right to free speech. ... I am not convinced that is a "plausible" reason. ... fire, you can yell fire. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • TRISTAN ANDERSON: Shot in the head with Tear Gas Canister
    ... 'There was no reason to fire at them' ... apparently after being hit by a tear gas canister. ... and watched the protestors. ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
  • Re: Proper ending for a blood thirsty guntard.
    ... > John P wrote: ... I'm not ragging on you for your age here, but, you ... Ever heard the term, "fire for effect?" ... I have no reason to believe really, ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: The *est Doctor Who episode
    ... got to be Planet of Fire for Peri`s two starring performances. ... mortal peril for no good reason at the end of eps 1 of Dragonfire. ... Most un-necessary sequel - Warriors of the Deep ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
Loading