Re: "***" causes RAGTIME cancellation!



robert armstrong wrote:
vincente scritta, con brio ma troppo:


Not to the point of whether people outside deserve to be exposed to this who did not consent to overhear it. For comparison, let's say a consenting adult audience were watching (artistically justified) full-frontal nudity in a park, and the image were visible to other people walking the perimeter of the park area.


You sound like the bunch who would bitch...


Alliteration: Considering the source, I'm impressed.


...how you could see an X rated film at the drive in from their window.


I'm saying those people have rights.


In other words tough


Maybe I was being a bit too strong with that statement.




Exactly when rights need be protected: when other people don't like the
right, or the individual.


The problem is and for the most part always has been what rights certain
groups and/or individuals feel they have over others.

"I don't like such and such and so you shouldn't watch or do it either"

--












*********************Less than 210 days to go**************************

.

Quantcast