Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: Mike Ash <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:45:46 -0400
In article <h59hc3$pa6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "aaron" <aar.ppl@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
While one might initially scoff at such an event, given how and why some
present-day operating systems crash, you might not dismiss that sort of
occurrence out of hand.
Sending a modern-day OS off the rails is like Dr. Feynmann getting the
ant to walk in circles after tricking it into laying a closed-loop scent
track. They have no intelligence, all action is simply mechanical, and
so trickery is easy.
A computer which can understand "create an adversary worth of this
fellow" and actually follow through by coming up with a fleshed-out
character should also be able to comprehend that it is a bad idea to
endanger the ship with its creation. That it didn't makes it
inconsistently smart.
--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: William December Starr
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- References:
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: Bill Snyder
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: aaron
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: William December Starr
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: Joseph Nebus
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- From: aaron
- Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- Prev by Date: Re: Why manned exploration of space?
- Next by Date: Re: New planetary adventures
- Previous by thread: Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- Next by thread: Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading