Re: statistics [was something else]

nance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Anthony Nance) wrote:

barf-bear <no@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
dbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David DeLaney) wrote:

barf-bear <no@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Anthony Nance) wrote:

In other words - they get it, the whole picture. They're wondering
if you do.

Strange, I'm looking at the wall that picture is hanging on.

A quick examination of Anthony's email address might provide a Clue...

Dave "just sayin'" DeLaney

Yes Dave, it's okay if Tony has vested interests, he still seems like
an okay guy to me.

And you seem like an okay guy to me too thanks.

For what it's worth, this group will openly and happily discuss just
about anything. What's happening in the almost-discussions you're
having here is that you're combining loaded language with the poorly
hid restraint at telling us how blinded (or dumb) we are if we have
questions/challenges.

More simply - you may well have a very interesting new cool thing
on your hands, and you yourself have mentioned what a challenge
you've had wrapping your head around whatever-it-is and expressing
it well. Good discussions here may help you with that, but loading
your language and retreating to telling us we're too closed-minded
(or dumb) to get it surely won't.

Tony

I've posted a link to the description on numerous occasions. This
morning I wrote the final post and closed it to comments. If you want
to read it, fine. http://www.commentsfromnobody.blogspot.com

I certainly understand the loaded-language issue. I also understand
needing to defend vested interests. I'm not here to convert anyone,
but neither am I here to talk handwavium just because that's what
people expect to hear.

Frankly I have more entertaining things to do than attempt to explain
something over and over and over to people who have a completely
different perspective they see no point in changing. I'll attempt to
just say nothing that could be construed to relate in any way to
probability, occurrence, the nature of reality, etc. from now on. I
may become extremely quiet, shouldn't break anyone here's heart.

--
sometimes a sig is just a sig.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: statistics [was something else]
    ... Dave "just sayin'" DeLaney ... Yes Dave, it's okay if Tony has vested interests, he still seems like ... having here is that you're combining loaded language with the poorly ... hid restraint at telling us how blinded (or dumb) we are if we have ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Setting Up New Users...Dumb question
    ... Okay, sorry if this is dumb, but, I was tinkering around with the settings ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Cloning methods
    ... Ladies and gentlemen, we have a record! ... 68 Lines in emaiI: ... 26 Lines of sig! ... okay in my defence I didn't see the sig's and they were rather excessive ...
    (Debian-User)
  • =?utf-8?Q?Re:=20South=20Regionals=202010=20location=20announced?=
    ... Okay, cool, let's just make all of the teams come to the ... This is why ultimate is so dumb. ... I guarantee every state has a soccer complex ...
    (rec.sport.disc)