Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- From: "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:20:03 -0800
Gene wrote:
"Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@xxxxxxxxxxx> rote in news:TfT5l.7553
$pr6.7311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
* Look at who your sole ally is, Gene. Any second thoughts?
The Duck is not my ally; he's not supported my position, whereas some
other posters have. Of course, since you and Dave, et al, can't be
bothered to discover what my position is it's not surprising to get
such a comment. You still don't have a clue what I said, do you?
I've put as much effort into deciphering your position as I feel is
warranted. (Seriously, do you think that this sort of simplification of a
more comlplex terminology is unusual on Wikipedia?)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- From: Gene
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- References:
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- From: nuny@xxxxxxx
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- From: David DeLaney
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- From: Gene
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- From: Gene
- Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- Prev by Date: Re: Skinned: What If They Don't Care About the Debate...
- Next by Date: Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- Previous by thread: Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- Next by thread: Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|