Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- From: mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stemper)
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:46:51 +0200 (CEST)
In article <ba86e6ac-3628-42a7-9f5f-605143a4abad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jordan179 <JSBassior2007@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Oct 14, 1:55=A0pm, thro...@xxxxxxxxx (Wayne Throop) wrote:
: Jordan179 <JSBassior2...@xxxxxxxxx>
: You are looking back at this from the point of view of modern
: knowledge, and _assuming_ that all the implications of nuclear physics
: were immediately worked out as soon as relativity was discovered.
No, he's looking at it from the point of view of somebody who knows
about the mass to luminosity relationship, the mass to energy relationshi
But when
were the basic physics of the ordinary Solar Phoenix 2H --> He cycle
first discovered?
I dunno about that, but I do know that it's described in Chapter XI of
George Gamow's famous 1947 popularization _One, Two, Three, ... Infinity_.
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
91.2% of all statistics are made up by the person quoting them.
.
- References:
- The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- From: Gene
- Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- From: Jordan179
- Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- From: Gene
- Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- From: Jordan179
- Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- From: Jordan179
- The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- Prev by Date: Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- Next by Date: Re: Is Elizabeth Moon any good?
- Previous by thread: Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- Next by thread: Re: The Mass-Luminosity Relationship
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|