Re: Resolved: Splitting the Editor Hugo was a mistake
- From: David T. Bilek <davidbilek@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:43:08 -0700
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:40:23 +0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@xxxxxxxxx (James
Nicoll) wrote:
For people who want to keep track of who edited what:
http://www.sfeditorwatch.com/index.php/Main_Page
I looked at that a bit yesterday while I was posting. Here's how it
breaks down for the people nominated for BEST EDITOR (LONG FORM) this
year:
Lou Anders: lists all(?) his edited books for 2007. It's a lot,
anyway.
I note that he edited BRASYL. I had no idea. Since that's far and
away my pick for best novel, maybe he should be my pick for best
editor? Although, like I said, since I didn't see the editing process
I really have no basis for judging how his editing went.
Beth Meacham: No listed books.
David Hartwell: Lists his books fro 2007. Negative points for not
nixing the whole Kennedy sthtick in IN WAR TIMES. He did edit
Schroeder and Stross, though. Again, I have no idea how good a job he
did.
Ginjer Buchanan: Doesn't list any books edited in 2007.
PNH: Lists a whole buncha books edited for 2007. Good stuff.
So the best site I've seen for finding out this information still
fails to list books edited by 40% of the nominees for Best Editor
(Long Form). Still, 60% knowledge is better than the 2% I had two
days ago.
Cool.
-David
.
- References:
- Resolved: Splitting the Editor Hugo was a mistake
- From: David T . Bilek
- Re: Resolved: Splitting the Editor Hugo was a mistake
- From: JScalzi
- Re: Resolved: Splitting the Editor Hugo was a mistake
- From: James Nicoll
- Resolved: Splitting the Editor Hugo was a mistake
- Prev by Date: Re: writers you refuse to read
- Next by Date: Re: Writers I gave up reading
- Previous by thread: Re: Resolved: Splitting the Editor Hugo was a mistake
- Next by thread: Re: Resolved: Splitting the Editor Hugo was a mistake
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading