Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stemper)
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:32:30 +0200 (CEST)
In article <6e4j9bF5cf65U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sean O'Hara <seanohara@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
In the Year of the Earth Rat, the Great and Powerful Will in New Haven declared:
On Jul 15, 3:21 pm, Patrick Baldwin <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I read most of the Heinlein juveniles when I was
a kid, and I've re-read a few over the years. I can't
think of anything objectionable in them. What was
such a big deal? And how much did she actually
end up changing?
The biggest fuss has been made about _Red Planet_ where she got rid of
some commens on gun control by the doctor. A recent edition restored
them.
What about the published ending of Podkayne of Mars vs. the one
Heinlein originally wrote? That strikes me as a bigger deal than
some expositing of ideas.
That was several years after Heinlein had left Scribner's, and hence a
different editor.
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
Economists have correctly predicted seven of the last three recessions.
.
- References:
- LotR is IMO without merit
- From: jack tingle
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Will in New Haven
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Will in New Haven
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Dorothy J Heydt
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Will in New Haven
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Sean O'Hara
- LotR is IMO without merit
- Prev by Date: Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- Next by Date: Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Previous by thread: Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Next by thread: Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
