Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:08:40 -0400
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:30:20 -0700, Kurt Busiek <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 2008-07-15 15:10:55 -0700, Patrick Baldwin <pax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Now I'm wondering if all those shared world anthologies I
used to like so much (Thieves World, Liavek, etc.) didn't
have any guidelines either, and how the hell could anyone
keep anything straight.
I'm sure some did and some didn't, but coordination would have been
much easier, because there are so few creators involved by comparison.
Plus, it's easier for a contributor to one of those to read everything
set in that world than it is for someone to do the same for Marvel or
DC's universes.
But I'd guess, at minimum, most of those worlds had maps...
Um... not all of them, and some authors (e.g., Gene Wolfe)
deliberately went off the edge of the map so as to not be constrained
by such details.
--
My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com
The ninth issue of the Hugo-nominated webzine Helix
is now at http://www.helixsf.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: James Nicoll
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Kurt Busiek
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- References:
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Kurt Busiek
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: David Goldfarb
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: PV
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Kurt Busiek
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Kurt Busiek
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- From: Kurt Busiek
- Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Prev by Date: Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Next by Date: Re: Arcane Volumes of Ancient OS Lore
- Previous by thread: Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Next by thread: Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|