Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stemper)
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:52:50 +0200 (CEST)
In article <ca08e94f-9df7-4fbe-92bd-11dd467ab73f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Moriarty <blues95@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Jul 11, 6:02=A0am, William Hyde <wthyde1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It was part and parcel of establishing this claim that lead Archbishop
Usher to decide that a universal
chronology was needed, and that required a starting date, hence the
4004 BC claim.
Ah yes, Ussher. Like many, I, with 20/20 hindsight, used to regard
him with amusement, hilarity even, over his 4004 BC claim. Then I
read Stephen Jay Gould's essay:
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_house-ussher.html
That was quite interesting. Thanks for posting it.
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
Reunite Gondwanaland!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Dan Goodman
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Paul Howard
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- References:
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Paul Howard
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: David DeLaney
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Paul Howard
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: William Hyde
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- From: Moriarty
- Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- Prev by Date: SFBC changes owners
- Next by Date: Re: LotR is IMO without merit
- Previous by thread: Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- Next by thread: Re: You know you're reading a Baen book if...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|