Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- From: dbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David DeLaney)
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 09:12:10 -0400
On Sat, 24 May 2008 15:20:38 +0000 (UTC), Dan Blum <tool@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Still, if the universe is splitting onchange,
every event, I don't see how it doesn't split on every particle movement,
or interaction.
It _does_. But then you sum over them to get what's observed, and a lot of
the fluff cancels out in the summation. If all you're detecting is the
momentum of particles A through J, then you sum over all the rest of the
particles near the experiment (or far away, actually)... Feynman did this
better than any of us.
there should be far, far too many to have
any chance of finding interesting ones.
There are - but they merge back together constantly also. "Particle A emits
photon at time T, absorbed by particle B at time T+2" merges into "Particle A
emits same photon at time T+.01, absorbed by particle B at time T+2.01", if
nobody observes either one or the photon until time T+7.
Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from dbd@xxxxxxx "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- From: Dan Blum
- Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- References:
- Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- From: Andrew Plotkin
- Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- From: Dan Blum
- Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- Prev by Date: Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- Next by Date: Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- Previous by thread: Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- Next by thread: Re: Diatribe against parallel universe stories
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|